
BATES
ARCHIVE
FEATURES
ARCHIVE
|
|
t
h e a t r e
Stages

Alan Bates, David Storey, Lindsay Anderson.
Photo by Tim O'Sullivan
Stages, by David Storey
(Richard Fenchurch) 18.xi.92, Cottesloe, Royal National
Theatre, London
directed by Lindsay Anderson
from the Telegraph Magazine, 15.xi.92
by Andro Linklater
NEXT WEEK the sign on the Royal National
Theatre's flashing billboard will look as though it has come
from a time warp. 'Alan Bates' it will say, 'appearing in David
Storey's new play STAGES. Directed by Lindsay Anderson.' This
is the team that helped transform British theatre in the 1960s:
Bates appeared in Look Back in Anger, Anderson was artistic director
of the Royal Court Theatre during its most revolutionary phase,
and Storey brought a breath of northern working-class life to
the West End. As long ago as 1969, all three collaborated on
Storey's play "In Celebration," but to the suggestion
that this might represent something of an old devils' reunion,
each reacted characteristically.
 Alan Bates
narrowed his blue-grey eyes and exclaimed, 'I certainly hope
not.' David Storey gazed steadily back, and replied carefully,
'I don't think that that is the case.' 'Bullshit,' said Lindsay
Anderson, simply.
Nonetheless, it is evident that they share
some common bond. This is the ninth play in which Anderson and
Storey have collaborated, and the third ("Life Class"
was the other) that all three have done together. Yet for all
their vast experience, both separately and as a team, it is fair
to say nothing has presented a challenge quite like "Stages."
Not only is the play written in spare, poetic language, but its
central character, a middle-aged artist looking back on his career
and an all-consuming love, is hovering on the brink of madness.
Even Alan Bates, whose remarkable career -- spanning four decades,
30 plays and as many film and television roles -- has given him
a taste for characters 'out of step with the world', found himself
agonising in early rehearsals over the right course to steer
between realism and fantasy.
'It's a very concentrated play,' he muttered,
'and there's a very precise line to find, and at the moment...'
his voice died away. He brushed his black hair off his forehead
and drew breath: 'But the signs are there, they're there,
and so long as I don't blow up...'
...
 '[Anderson]
loves actors and enjoys what they do,' Alan Bates said. 'And
if he is acerbic, it is done with enormous humour and wit.' He
speaks from long experience. When he began work on "In Celebration,"
he already had an unusually varied string of credits, including
much praised performances in the original productions of "Look
Back in Anger" and Pinter's "The Caretaker," and
was surprised to find himself gently reined in by the director.
'I think I'd got myself to the point where
I was a little bit all over the place,' he admitted. 'Lindsay
was a great leveller, a great discourager of excess and affectation.
He came at a very good time, when I needed to be challenged.'
In the years since "In Celebration,"
Bates has achieved the extraordinary feat of becoming a box-office
star in cinema and television as well as on stage, with a reputation
as an actor prepared to take risks. Whether wrestling naked in
"Women in Love" or submerging himself in the moral
corruption of Guy Burgess and Colonel Redl in Osborne's "A
Patriot for Me," he has welcomed the chance to live dangerously.
'You can't afford to lose the sense of excitement,'
he said, 'and it's fun to play difficult characters, people who
are on the edge, who are out of step with the world, perhaps
because they're not quite coping, or because they can't be bothered.
I find that interesting.'
...'Alan has an instinctive understanding
of David and his work,' Anderson pointed out. 'That's why I wanted
him for this part. It makes everything easier because there's
so much you don't have to explain.'
...
There is a certain irony in hearing
yesterday's revolutionaries sounding like today's old guard,
but it is clear that it is the times, not they, that have changed.
They remain as uncompromising as ever.
"Stages," Anderson insists, is
about love; an obsessional, all-consuming love, says Bates; it
is, Storey proposes, about what might be described as an idealised
love.
It is also about the sacrifice artists make
for their art.
r e v i e w s
from the Daily Mail, 19.xi.92
by Jack Tinker
THE SOURCE of any artistic impulse is
in itself a mystery. Yet David Storey's starkly observed portrait
of an artist in extremis leaves us as close to the core of this
eternal enigma as almost anything I have hitherto seen on any
stage. He delivers a painful portrait -- some suggest a self-portrait
-- of a man at the very edge of his creative and emotional rationale.
A man who, at the height of his fame as a painter and writer,
finds himself going slowly mad.
...we see Alan Bates, giving
one of the great
performances of this or any
other year,
gradually releasing his grip
on reality...
Not, as
Storey himself explains in one of his own poems, mad 'as the
axeman or the drunk is mad / But as a climber slipping his last
hold might fall ...'
Here we see Alan Bates, giving
one of the great performances of this or any other year, gradually
releasing his grip on reality. However, in doing so he discovers
the pain, the guilt and the black self-doubt which probably has
fuelled his art throughout. The intrinsic beauty of the performance,
of the writing, of the whole production, is that he takes us
step-by-step with him on this slow descent among the ghosts of
his own past.
It is in part a cold confessional and a passionately
illustrated case history. With each turn in his emotional landscape
we are forced to readjust our own focus on him. Bates paces the
stage like some large, bulky bear. By turns locked into the depressive
symptoms of his own illness and taking animated flights of fantasy.
We understand completely how such a man could have become isolated
to a degree where his loved ones, including the wife who deserted
him, came to have him sectioned under the Mental Health Act.
And it is all too clear that they are gathering once more to
assess his last hopes of recovery.
Lindsay Anderson directs with a masterly
touch, highlighting the poetic quality of the text by treating
the piece as hauntingly and hypnotically as a minuet played in
a minor key. Four women in the artist's life present themselves
during the short, unbroken action. Each one tries to re-establish
his hold on the present; each merely inflames his desire to retreat
into the recesses of his past.
All four are performed with deeply-felt understanding
-- daughter, ex-wife, psychiatrist, and icon-mistress (Gabrielle
Lloyd, Marjorie Yates, Joanna David and Rosemary Martin, respectively).
To attempt to describe the details of this would be to destroy
the several dramatic surprises the narrative yields. Suffice
it to say mr Bates's torment is not, as we first suspect, entirely
the cliched embarassment of a successful creative son for the
suffering of his working-class parents.
Nor is it even just a metaphor -- as Storey
at one point suggests -- for the loss of the creative drive in
pictures, books and plays which marked the first half of the
20th century and of which, arguably, Storey and his contemporaries
were a last flowering.
That is there; but there is also much, much
more.
from The Times, 19.xi.92
Stages on the road to isolation
by Benedict Nightingale
...When Bates talks of his father, or
the old Yorkshire, or living in a garret in London, or an alcoholic
mistress who committed suicide, he effortlessly holds the stage
and our attention; and when he turns to Isabella, as his mother-in-law
was called, it is with a quiet tenderness of which I for one
had not hitherto thought him capable.
from The Independent on Sunday, 22.xi.92
Storey's wounded Northerner award
by Irving Wardle
...Fenchurch pours his confession of secret love into the ear
of a sympathetic neighbour (Rosemary Martin) who apparently metamorphoses
into his dead beloved. Or perhaps not.
However unprepared, this climax
at least moves Alan Bates beyond the secure confines of morose
regret and defensive irony. I did not know he had such passion
in him. And its impact is reinforced by the fastidious deliberation
of Lindsay Anderson's direction, in which the placing of a chair,
or the crossing of a leg, counts as a significant event. The
set, by Anderson's long-time partner Jocelyn Herbert, consists
of a bare, beige room which simultaneously supplies a neutral
background and a sense of fatality.
from The Stage, 16.xii.92
Storey reaches the final Stages
by Peter Hepple
...Under Lindsay Anderson's sensitive
direction, Alan Bates gives one of his most notable performances
as a man deep in melancholy reduced to a kind of artistic pottering
about, unable to connect with the worlds of the present and the
past and destined to slide, despite all entreaties, into inevitable
mental decline.
from The Independent, 19.xi.92
Colouring in the background
by Paul Taylor
...Alan Bates excellently captures all the nuances of this complicated
man. There's the melancholy mock-whimsicality (all ironic flourishes
of the head and sardonic beetling brows) which give a superior
disguise to biting self-hatred. (Characteristically pooh-poohing
the psychiatrist on whom he has depended, he remarks that "she'd
have treated Christ with anti-depressants".) There's the
quietly desperate man who pads about his room like a dazed, disoriented
bear and the volatile romantic who, the more he is urged to consider
his present needs, heads off into a febrile fantasy-recreation
of the past, madly projecting his love for other women onto the
willing red-head next door (Rosemary Martin).
A delicate chamber piece, the
play is also an echo-chamber of themes from Storey's earlier
work, especially the difficulty of reconciling working class
roots with a career as an intellectual and artist. At times,
the preoccupations of "In Celebration" seem to be married
to the poetic manner of "Home"...
|