"KING ARTHUR"
LINKS

Buxton Opera
House

BATES
ARCHIVE

News
In Memoriam

SPOTLIGHTS

Knighthood
American
Film Theatre

Fifties TV
Al Hirschfeld

FEATURES

Biography
Timeline
Photo Gallery
Actors Centre
Piffle
Ephemera

ARCHIVE

Theatre
Film
Television
Audio
Interviews
Writing

 

 t h e a t r e

King Arthur

 



King Arthur, opera by Henry Purcell, verse by John Dryden
(title role, written to be spoken, not sung)
July 1986, Buxton Opera House, Buxton, Derbyshire
directed by Malcolm Fraser
Manchester Camerata conducted by Anthony Hose

 

from the Observer, 27.vii.86

Purcell's Arthurian Incidental Music
by Peter Heyworth
 
NESTLING IN A FOLD in the Peak District, Buxton boasts one of the most enchanting opera houses in the country. Rescued from bingo eight years ago and lovingly restored down to the last detial, Matcham's theatre of 1903 has a style and unity lacking in his cumbersome Coliseum in St Martin's Lane. It provides exactly the sort of accommodation small-scale opera needs and, in Britain at any rate, so rarely finds.
But Buxton not only has a jewel of a theatre; it has a policy. Instead of picking events like currants out of a cake, it takes a theme, around which it builds its annual programme. This year that theme is Arthurian legend. Did Buxton make that choice in order to perform Purcell's King Arthur, or, having made it, did it find this rarely staged 'dramatic opera' inescapable? Either way, it has certainly shown courage.
For, despite its title, King Arthur is neither dramatic, nor is it an opera, in the traditional use of the word. The basic problem is that its main characters do not sing. The plot (and apretty ramshackle affair that is) is carried by Dryden's verbiage, while the music for the most part confines itself to providing suitable embellishment.
That arrangement reflects all too clearly a theatrical tradition in which, in contrast to Italy, music plays a subordinate role. It also throws light on the relationship between a promising young composer and an established man of letters. Had Purcell not died at the age of only 36, he might well have reversed the role of music in the English theatre and in so doing establish some equivalent of the dramma per musica that was fast developing on the Continent. Because he failed to do so, Britain became, and until this century remained, a musical backwater.
In Purcell's score one marvellous number follows another. The range of his invention embraces battle scenes, religious ritual, love music and pastoral numbers. But it is characteristic of the work that its celebrated Frost Scene should have only very marginal relevance to the drama. In an essay in the programme book Dr Curtis Price, an expert in these matters, claims that such 'masques and entertainments ... help to shift the action of the speaking characters on to a genuinely operatic level.' That smacks of special pleading. In my view Purcell's contribution to King Arthur amounts to little more than what another expert, Robert Etheridge Moore, describes as 'aggrandised incidental music.'
The subordinate role of music in a play that is today no more than a lifeless artefact presents a producer with formidable hurdles which Malcolm Farser in the main convincingly clears at Buxton. At any rate he succeeds in keeping the stage alive, while Fay Conway's elaborate scheme of scrims and drops engages the eye while providing for the frequent changes of scene. The main difficulty is that the chorus has to dance, which it does with the obtrusive enthusiasm that always marks the amateur on the stage. (I hasten to add that they are not, of course amateur singers.)
Anthony Hose draws stylish playing from the Manchester Camerata, who, however, only began to use their old trumpets and baroque bows convincingly in the second half of the evening; up to that point the instrumental performance had been wanting in polish. Among a group of 12 singers, who serve as chorus as well as soloists, two were outstanding. Eileen Hulse's soprano rang out with crystalline clarity; Steven Page revealed evident musicality as well as a fine bass-baritone voice of individual quality.
Among the spoken roles, Lucy Gutteridge, who brought meaning even to the most implausible events, stood out as the heroine. As a suitably heroic king of the Saxons, Jack Klaff made every word tell. That's more than I can say for Alan Bates. Suffering from a damaged knee, he wandered disconsolately around the stage as though bemused at finding himself in such strange company.
All told, it was a good shot at the sort of problem work that a festival worth its salt should sometimes tackle. I was grateful for an opportunity to see again on the stage an historic monument that in more favourable conditions might have laid the foundation of a British National Opera. But I have to confess that I would not weep were I never to see it again. |||