"Caretaker"
Links

BATES
ARCHIVE
FEATURES
ARCHIVE
"Since
the remarkable success of "The Caretaker" in 1960,
Harold Pinter has been recognized as 'the most fascinating, enigmatic,
and accomplished dramatist in the English language."
- Newsweek
"The Caretaker"
is a powerful drama with a climax that tears at the heart and
proclaims its author as one of the most important playwrights
of our day."
- New York
Times
* * *
Donald Pleasence
died at 75 in 1995.
Robert Shaw
died of a heart attack in 1978; he was only 51 years old.
Peter Woodthorpe
appeared most recently in th 1999 "David Copperfield mini.
Harold Pinter
recently celebrated his 70th birthday. He has a new play in production,
and his long-planned Proust adaptation opens at the National
Theatre in November.
Michael Codron
is still an active West End producer.
Alan Bates
died of pancreatic cancer in 2003.
* * *
Further Reading
"The Life
and Work of Harold Pinter," by Michael Billington, a superb
biography, has extensive mention of "The Caretaker"
and related topics.
"Conversations
with Pinter," by Mel Gussow.
* * *
Footnote
As part of
the Royal National Theatre's "NT2000" programme celebrating
100 plays of the last century, several scenes from "The
Caretaker" were presented on 30 April 1999 at the Lyttelton
Theatre. Harold Pinter
appeared in the role of Aston; it
was a fascinating reading, marred only by the fact that at Mr
Pinter's request no questions were allowed at the end. Warren
Mitchell played Davies, and Roger Lloyd Pack, Mick.
|
|
t h
e a t r e
The Caretaker
Bates Archive Spotlight
April 2000, 40th anniversary of the play's premiere
Reunion This wonderful photo was taken by L. Arnold Weissberger
in London in June, 1971: "Shortly after the opening of Harold
Pinter's "Old Times," I gave a party for Harold at
our rooms at the Savoy Hotel. As the guests gathered I suddenly
realized that we had with us the cast of the New York and subsequent
film productions of Harold's first success, "The Caretaker."
Alan Bates, Donald Pleasence and Robert Shaw, not to mention
Harold himself, had been almost unknown to New York audiences
when the play opened. I herded them out of the drawing room into
my bedroom, removed the shade from the bedside reading lamp to
get better light, and snapped this picture."
IN CELEBRATING the "Caretaker" anniversary,
Pleasence scholar Christopher Weedman and I
have divided up a wealth of material between our two web sites.
Visit these four links to explore the 1960-61 productions,
the resulting film, and the 1991 London revival:
London, 1960 |||.New York, 1961 |||
Film, 1964 ||| Revival, 1991
If you have not seen "The Caretaker,"
I hope you'll spend a couple of hours reading it soon.
|
|||. i
n t r o d u c t i o n .|||
"A ROOM. A window in the back wall, the bottom half
covered by a sack. An iron bed along the left wall. Above it
a small cupboard, paint buckets, boxes containing nuts, screws,
etc. More boxes, vases, by the side of the bed. A door, up right.
To the right of the window, a mound: a kitchen sink a step-ladder,
a coal bucket, a lawn-mower, a shopping trolley, boxes, sideboard
drawers. Under this mound an iron bed. In front of it a gas stove.
On the gas stove a statue of Buddha. Down right, a fireplace.
Around it a couple of suitcases, rolled carpet, a blow-lamp,
a wooden chair on its side, boxes, a number or ornaments, a clothes
horse, a few short planks of wood, a small electric fire and
a very old electric toaster. Below this a pile of old newspapers.
Under ASTON'S bed by the left wall, is
an electrolux, which is not seen till used. A bucket hangs from
the ceiling."
 THIS IS Harold Pinter's stage
setting for "The Caretaker," his first successful play.
The action of the play takes place in a house in West London;
Act I, a winter night; Act II, a few second later, and Act III,
a fortnight later. What happens in that attic room, between brothers
Mick and Aston, and the tramp, Davies?
In all of Pinter's
plays, seemingly ordinary events become charged with profound,
if elusive, meaning, haunting pathos, and wild comedy. In "The
Caretaker," a tramp finds lodging in the derelict house
of two brothers. Harold Pinter gradually exposes the inner strains
and fears of his characters, alternating hilarity and terror
to create an almost unbearable edge of tension.
Tramp's Progress
from the Sunday Times, 16 June
1991
At the beginning of 1958 Harold Pinter moved into
two rooms in Chiswick High Road with his wife and newborn son.
The accommodation was modest - there was a shared lavatory -
but it was
better than nothing and until he found it his wife had had to stay on in hospital. The house
was shared by two brothers, the elder of whom offered a tramp
shelter in it. Eventually, after a row, the tramp was thrown
out.
Pinter watched from
the sidelines and an idea was born. That idea became one of the
most influential plays of the century. ...
In May of that year
Pinter, who was known as David Baron as an actor, had another
play, "The Birthday Party, scheduled for production at the
Lyric, Hammersmith. It met with incomprehension. "Sorry
Mr Pinter, you're just not funny enough." (Evening Standard)
... "What all this means only Mr Pinter knows." (Manchester
Guardian) ... The only comprehending review, by Harold Hobson,
appeared in The Sunday Times: "Deliberately, I am willing
to risk whatever reputation I have as a judge of plays by saying
that Mr Pinter possesses the most original, disturbing, and arresting
talent in theatrical London." But by the time the review
appeared, the play had closed with takings totaling £260
for the week.
  It was in these circumstances
that Pinter, in the house in Chiswick, having little work as
an actor, wrote "The Caretaker," the play about a tramp
and two brothers which was to transform his life. The script
was sent to Donald Pleasence by the producer Michael Codron,
who was putting it on at the small Arts Theatre after the losses
he had sustained on "The Birthday Party."
"It was like
being handed "The Cherry Orchard" before it had been
seen," Pleasence recalled [at the time of the 1991 revival,
in which he repeated his original role]. "One's first reaction
was: what curious people, why are they talking like that? But
I thought it was a masterpiece and I still think the same."
He was busy filming at the time. "There were only three
weeks for rehearsal. We did it in a hell of a hurry as a labour
of love, because the money was nothing. I was overworked and
tired and was pounding this enormous text into my head - one
of the longest parts written."
|||. Pinter:
''If it isn't funny it isn't anything." .|||
Pinter attended rehearsals
and Pleasence drove him home at night. "He was very helpful
to an actor, provided you asked him precise questions; I said,
'It's supposed to be funny, isn't it?' He replied, 'If it isn't
funny it isn't anything.' One night we stopped outside this house
in Chiswick High Road and I realised I knew it. I'd had my photograph
taken next door by an Indian stage photographer who lived there
with his elegant wife." These were the "blacks"
whom Davies, the tramp, complained about sharing the lavatory
with, Pinter told him.
"The tramp was
still knocking around. One day during rehearsals Harold met him
and discovered he was washing up in the Black and White milk
bar. He was last seen crossing Hammersmith Bridge. 'What did
you feel about the old man at the end?' I asked him. 'Thank Christ
they got rid of the old bastard,' he said. That was very helpful
to me."
  The first night of "The Caretaker"
caused plenty of mirth in the theatre, whose small auditorium
was largely filled with critics. But they did not fall over in
eagerness to make reparations for murdering "The Birthday
Party." The Times called "The Caretaker a "slight"
play, leaving it in "pleasurable confusion." The Daily
Telegraph found it "excessively derivative" from "Waiting
for Godot." The Guardian man said: "It is a fascinating
by-way but one hopes he will move on."
It is strange now
to recall the amount of mystification then surrounding all discussions
of Pinter's work, the much quoted "non-communication"
of his characters (not at all evident now), their "Pinterish"
or "Pinteresque" absurdities of speech - both words
came into use soon after the play opened in 1960.
"What is obscure
is the connection between what the character says and what another
says afterwards. How do they communicate? Do they communicate
at all? We do not know." Thus The Times critic lacerated
himself. Theories were plentiful about what the characters symbolised,
just as they had been with "Waiting for Godot" five
years earlier. People expected stage characters either to explain
themselves or to symbolise Something Else."
|||. legitimate
and worthy of attention .|||
Pinter had gone so
far as to write an unsigned programme note for the Royal Court
production of "The Room" and "The Dumb Waiter"
a month beforehand: "A character who can present no convincing
argument or information as to his past experience, his present
behaviour or his aspirations, nor give a comprehensive analysis
of his motives, is as legitimate and worthy of attention as one
who, alarmingly, can do all these things," he wrote.

Pinter with Pleasence and Bates in rehearsal
In those more approachable
days, Pinter gave occasional interviews: "There have been
a lot of assumptions of clear and definite behaviour," he
said toe, discussing the reaction to "The Caretaker,"
"But I don't find my own behaviour definite and clear. To
pretend to find your behaviour clear is to engage in a conspiracy
with other people who would like to find their own behaviour
clear. Most of the time we're elusive, evasive, obstructive."
He also said of the
tramp who inspired Davies, "I got some of the lines from
this tramp. The rest I took forward in a sort of logical progression.
That line of his about having had dinner with the best - I never
heard a tramp say that."
|||.
a hot ticket .|||
By the time "The
Caretaker" transferred to the Duchess Theatre at the end
of May, 1960, a much bigger public was alert to the fascination
of Pinter's dialogue. "The Birthday Party" had been
televised successfully in March, followed by "A Night Out."
It was the beginning of a brief love affair between the small
screen and a prestigious playwright who supplied it with a stream
of works that were to be television events. "The Caretaker"
became a hot ticket and broke the box office record at the Duchess.
"We thought we
might get the overspill from the Strand theatre opposite, where
Olivier was playing in "Rhinoceros," says Pleasence,
"but in fact they got the overspill from us." It ran
for 18 months before transferring to New York, where the critical
acclaim was great but the run a modest five months. ... For his
performance as the tramp Pleasence won the London critics' best
actor award, was nominated for a Tony award in New York and later
was voted in Time magazine to have given the "best stage
performance of the decade."
"The Caretaker"
had 11 productions overseas in its first year alone. Since then
scarcely a year has gone by without there being at least one
production of it in a leading foreign theatre. |||
London,
1960 |||.New York, 1961 |||
Film, 1964 ||| Revival, 1991
|