BA Shop
Film Links

 Bates Film &
Television
Checklist
Bates 101
Internet Movie
Database
(IMDb)
British Film
Institute (BFI)
Not On

BATES ARCHIVE

News
In Memoriam

SPOTLIGHTS

Knighthood
American
Film Theatre

Fifties TV
Al Hirschfeld

FEATURES

Biography
Timeline
Photo Gallery
Actors Centre
Piffle
Ephemera

ARCHIVE

Theatre
Film
Television
Audio
Interviews
Writing

 

f i l m

Return of the Soldier

Directed by Alan Bridges in 1982
Script by Hugh Whitemore from Rebecca West's 1918 novel
distributed by 20th Century Fox, 101 minutes


An analysis...

From Magill's Survey of Cinema

Chris Baldry (Alan Bates) returns from World War I a victim of amnesia. Instead of returning to his wife, Kitty (Julie Christie), and his cousin Jenny (Ann-Margret), Chris contacts his first love, Margaret Grey (Glenda Jackson). Although Jenny and Kitty resent and dislike the lower-class, dowdy Margaret, the three women conspire to restore Chris's memory. They do, and Chris returns to the front. ...
Based on Rebecca West's first novel (published in 1918), The Return of the Soldier is -- on the level of plot -- a simple, somewhat dated, sentimental story, which employs an overused, nineteenth century, melodramatic device: amnesia. In the hands of director Alan Bridges and screenwriter Hugh Whitemore, however, the film becomes a penetrating psychological study communicating the essence of West's work. ...
Novelist Rebecca West's pioneering attempt to incorporate Sigmund Freud's analysis of human psychology at both the symbolic and narrative level is maintained in the film version of The Return of the Soldier. Delineated as representations of mind (Jenny), body (Kitty), and soul (Margaret), the three women in The Return of the Soldier also neatly represent Freud's conception of the tripartite mind. Kitty is the superego, a soulless, patterned, rational being. Jenny is the mediator, the ego, compassionate and loving, yet successful in suppressing her sexual desires for her cousin. Finally, it is the instinctual Margaret who champions the id with her innate sensuality.

The film is not sentimentalized...

The conflict in the drama lies in Chris's internal integration of this externalized psyche. To become fully human, he must accept the role of each of these women, denying none of these parts of himself. Margaret, like Chris, uses the trauma to integrate her buried past and emerge a whole woman. Jenny also experiences growth. Through Margaret's presence, Jenny awakes to Kitty's falseness, to the fragility of their mannered lives, and to her own compromised role in Chris's home. She realizes that while there was a place for her in his marriage, there is no room for her in his love affair. Kitty, however, remains unchanged. Always the somnambulist, she sleepwalks through the drama, clinging to the hope that her ordered life will be regained through Chris's cure. She is untouched by the events, still the ideal Victorian woman -- a beautiful object. In her highly cultured state, however, Kitty is forever brittle, emotionless, and ultimately lifeless. ...
Director Alan Bridges, whose film The Hireling won The Cannes Golden Palm for Best Picture in 1973, and Hugh Whitemore, who has done distinguished work in British television (Elizabeth R, All Creatures Great and Small and Rebecca) as well as film and theater (Stevie, 1978), together have maintained a literary quality in The Return of the Soldier.
The film is extremely faithful to its source; few scenes are added or altered. A letter telling of Chris's condition becomes a visit to the hospital, while a trip to Monkey Island replaces a verbal description. In contrast to the novel, the film is not sentimentalized; if anything, it is too detached, lacking the feelings commensurate with such vital interpersonal drama.
* Despite a positive reception at the Cannes Film Festival in May, 1982, The Return of the Soldier met with mixed reviews. The film also suffered from distribution problems; because of litigation, it was withheld from United States and Canadian markets until late 1984. Again, the American reviews praised the performances -- especially Ann-Margret' s Jenny -- but found the film as a whole unsatisfying.

Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr proposed by Warner Bros...

Finding the film too literary and restrained, critics suggested that The Return of the Soldier might have been more successful had Bridges employed a sentimental treatment imitative of the style of such 1940's tearjerkers as Random Harvest (1942) or Love Letters (1945) -- both stories of romance and amnesia. In fact, Warner Bros. had planned a production of The Return of the Soldier for Bette Davis (as Margaret Grey) in 1946, based on a screenplay by women's films "expert" Catherine Turney, but the project was abandoned. The studio reactivated the script in 1958, hoping to cast Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr after their success in An Affair to Remember (1957), but The Return of the Soldier remained unproduced.
For audiences who recently had embraced the overt sentimentality of such films as ET: The Extra-Terrestrial (1982) and Terms of Endearment (1983), The Return of the Soldier was judged too psychological in subject matter and too emotionally detached in treatment to elicit general appeal. As a result, the film received limited distribution, playing primarily to small theaters and art houses.
© Magill's Survey of Cinema, 1995.

Peter Travers in People, 18.ii.85.

Hem and haw if you must about the wisdom of making a film now of Rebecca West's 1918 novel about a shell-shocked World War I soldier's return to England and a wife he can't remember. There are pitfalls. Director Alan (The Hireling) Bridges approaches the novel hat in hand, as if Masterpiece Theatre represented the last word in adventuresome filmmaking. And too often, screenwriter Hugh Whitemore lets Dame Rebecca's literary symbols suffocate the drama. But drama there is.
And what success Bridges has had with his cast! Alan Bates brings astonishing shadings to the role of a wealthy Englishman who goes off to a war that erases all memories except those of his youth. While his snobbish wife remains a dim shadow, he still sees his now dowdy, sexually repressed cousin as she was as a girl. A third woman, an innkeeper's daughter he once loved, has since married, raised a family and become decidedly middle class. To watch years drop off Bates' face just at the mention of his old love's name is to see a great actor at his peak.
But The Return of the Soldier is not a one-man show. Bridges has cast three remarkable actresses against type as the women in Bates' life. It's a big risk that pays off handsomely. As the childhood sweetheart, headstrong Glenda Jackson turns in the most fragile, affecting performance of her career. Through subtle changes in her eyes, voice and posture, Jackson lets us see the girl she was without any help from the makeup department. Her final scene with Bates (shot at a distance from a window) is tenderly moving.
Julie Christie, still radiantly beautiful at 43, would have seemed a more likely choice to play the innkeeper's daughter. Bridges, however, cast her in the bitch-wife part, and it was an inspiration. Christie can breathe a dragon's fire into every syllable of a line like, "She stinks of poverty and neglect," without losing a shred of composure.
The quintessentially American Ann-Margret would appear wrong for just about any role in this very British film, most of all that of the spinster cousin. But Ann-Margret has been full of surprises lately. Here she is nothing less than fiercely splendid--all banked embers in a furnace that wants to roar. Performances of such quality are rare in any movie season. Having them all in one film offers an opportunity it would be unwise to neglect.
© Time, Inc., 1985.

Alan Bates comments ...

From a 1995 interview in An Autobiography of British Cinema

"[Return of the Soldier] was an underrated film ... there was one thing that it missed: it should have had a voice-over because the book was written in the first person. The first person was the Ann-Margret character, who is a seemingly very sweet woman, the victim cousin who's in love, long-suffering, but in her head she's quite a bitch. If you don't get the voice-over, you don't get the bitch; all you get is a very sweet woman. It lacked edge because of that. I think if it had had that it would have been much more successful.
"...I thought Julie was at her best, I think Glenda was terrific in her part and Ann-Margret was wonderful, and I wish for her sake it had just had her voice-over. I mean, she really resented Glenda's character; while being seemingly sweet to her, she absolutely resented her and that wasn't fair."
© Brian McFarlane, 1997

 

Review from State of the Art
© 1985 by Pauline Kael
E. P. Dutton, ISBN 0-525-24369-0

Alan Bridges' film version of Rebecca West's first novel, The Return of the Soldier, which she began writing in the winter of 1915-16 and published in 1918, when she was twenty-five, creates a special literary universe. It gives you the feeling that you sometimes get when you read an "advanced" novel of the twenties, with a "daring," "modern" way of looking at things, and are touched and charmed by its streamlined Victorianism. Set in 1916, the movie is like a piece of intellectual history. It re-creates an era when Freudianism was new, and when an author might apply it to characters' lives in a spirit of heroic revelation.
The conflict is: Should the shell-shocked, amnesiac Captain Chris Baldry (Alan Bates), who has forgotten the last twenty years of his life, be allowed to remain in his boyish state of happiness, or should he be forced to confront the truth? (It's the same theme that O'Neill wrestled with in The Iceman Cometh: Are people strong enough to live with "the truth?") Chris was unconsciously discontented, the Freudian-minded doctor from London suggests, and that is why he has blotted out all knowledge of the years of his maturity and his marriage to the beautiful Kitty (Julie Christie). He has regressed to the time of his greatest joy, when he was young and in love with Margaret (Glenda Jackson), an innkeeper's daughter.
Although it takes a few minutes to yield to this movie--to enter this past and to enjoy the psychological and sexual dilemmas that Rebecca West posed--Julie Christie brings you into it, by making you laugh. Kitty sits in her elegantly decorated manor house, in its immaculate grounds, and when the drab, middle-aged Margaret, in an ugly, practical raincoat, comes to tell her that Chris is in a hospital, Kitty won't believe her. She is so offended that this grubby creature could presume to bring her news of her husband that she rings for a servant to throw the woman out. Kitty's vanity and self-centeredness are outrageous and unconcealed, and her snobbery is so mean-spirited that she's funny. And she's so possessive that her husband's having forgotten her existence seems like crazy justice. Julie Christie is wonderful to watch; she's a ravishing camera subject who knows how to turn her beauty against herself. With her body caressed by soft silks, she still manages to divorce Kitty's beauty from sexuality. She makes you feel that Kitty is ornamental through and through, that there's no passion in her, or generosity, either. Kitty uses her beauty as a blindfold. She's petulant and ineducable, and so her inability to understand how Chris can prefer the dowdy creature whom she finds physically nauseating is a source of comedy. Kitty has lived up to her understanding of what a wife should be, and she wants this messy inconvenience of her husband's amnesia cleared away.
As the shabby, gentle Margaret, Glenda Jackson has a marvellous leanness to her acting. She's completely in character, though it's the soft of simple, good-woman role that, reading the book, one might think unlayable--and she might be the last actress to come to mind. When she and Chris walk together, you can feel the bond between them, and when she sits on the ground watching him stretched out next to her, you feel she has given him the gift of untroubled sleep. Miscast, Jackson can scratch on one's nerves; she can even seem to be scratching on her own nerves. But she takes Rebecca West's literary conception of an instinctual, loving woman and gets right down to the nub of the character, and she does it with an east that's fairly astounding. (Her leanness is particularly fine in her scenes with Frank Finlay, who plays Margaret's puttering-in-the-garden husband.) Hugh Whitemore, who adapted the novel, has written other roles Glenda Jackson has scored in (the play and film Stevie, the six-part "Elizabeth R" on television); here, he takes much of the dialogue from the novel, and the novelist's dialogue is essential, because of the film's literary ambience. The novel has a narrator--Chris's cousin and childhood playmate Jenny. Whitemore uses Jenny (Ann-Margret) merely as the mediator between Kitty and Margaret. It's a colorless, thankless role--the unselfish Jenny adores Chris, but knows that the contest is between the two other women. At one point, Kitty, moving across a room, kicks a little dog out of her way; a moment later, Jenny leans over and pets it. That's her function all the way through--she soothes ruffled feelings. What Ann-Margret is doing here as an English spinster is a little puzzling (it has to do with the mysteries of getting a film financed), but her bone structure has an aristocratic quality and she acquits herself with likable dignity.

Alan Bates has a gift for letting us see

that the character he plays is being acted upon.


Alan Bates has a gift for letting us see that the character he plays is being acted upon. As Chris, he has to carry the burden of being loved by Kitty and Jenny, and he carries it rather heavily--which makes it work. when Chris comes home from the hospital, he tells Kitty and Jenny, "If I do not see Margaret Allington, I shall die." That's a period-novel line, and Bates wouldn't get away with statements like this if it weren't for the weight he gives them and a piteousness that you don't laugh off. Amnesiac war heroes have been a subject for parody for several decades (the 1942 Random Harvest was the last straw), but Bates has an aura of middle-aged bewilderment that saves him. He's not playing simply a shell-shocked man of the First World War era--he's giving an authentic performance as a shell-shocked romantic hero of that era. And when Kitty, under duress, permits Chris to see Margaret--certain that he'll be appalled at the sight of her frumpiness--Bates brings off the scene in which Chris runs to Margaret and embraces her and doesn't even notice that she looks sallow and ordinary; they walk together with immediate intimacy and understanding.
In the novel, Jenny goes out in the woods to find Chris and Margaret and sees them "englobed in peace as in a crystal sphere." That's how they are in the movie, too. And the phrase might describe the whole movie. Alan Bridges' storytelling methods aren't much more than a thoughtful application of television technique, but the feeling of enclosure in time and space is just what this story needs. As Rebecca West conceived it -- and she was writing during the First World War--it is partly about women's attitudes toward the fighting. The title refers not just to Chris's return to the manor but to what Margaret and Jenny fear--that if his memory is restored he will have to return to the trenches. (This possibility doesn't faze Kitty in the slightest.)
The middle-aged Chris, who's in love in a young man's way, is, in effect, experiencing a second childhood. As Bates plays him, he might seem perfectly happy if it weren't for the blankness in his gray eyes. His eyes tell us that he's lost -- that he's not fully there. And Jenny and Margaret recognize that he can't be fully a man without his memories of pain. (In the novel, part of that pain was his slaving in business all those -- now forgotten -- years to pay for Kitty's tastes, her redecoration of the house, and the upkeep on the grounds; in the movie, he seems to have done nothing, except go to board meetings and ride horses and play golf--perhaps so that the film can score a point against his class.)
The movie's simplified psychology is amusingly fragrant, and melodramatic. Ian Holm is on hand, as the lively, gnomish London doctor who parcels out the meaning and significance of Chris's shell shock. The film is a "civilized entertainment"-- a curiosity. It's neither great nor exciting, and much of what makes it enjoyable is what we usually think of as peripheral: the moderne decor in the manor house which the production designer, Luciana Arrighi, has come up with; the jewels and clinging silks that the costume designer, Shirley Russell, has put on Julie Christie; the toylike automobiles; Kitty having her thick dark-blond hair brushed, or piling it up in wonderful loose, Pre-Raphaelite coils; even an outre witch's hat that Ann-Margaret wears -- it's black, with spidery red embroidery running around the crown. And the contrast between the details of Baldry Court and the little row house where Margaret lives is like a visual essay on class determination of taste
.But the acting saves the conception from preciousness. (The acting is so good that Bridges and Whitemore might have dispensed with the flashbacks to Chris and Margaret's youthful ardor; seeing them together now tells us about their past, and it's more stirring.) The movie isn't essentially different from the Masterpiece Theatre adaptations of famous novels, but it doesn't have all that drawn-out tiresomeness,and since it's based on a little-known and minor novel, it has some freshness to it. And the novel's dated modernity may give us pause. It has only been a few decades since Freud and Victoria walked arm in arm; in this material, Chris's return to reality doesn't mean learning what his repressed feelings are and freeing himself from a dead marriage--it means going back to being a proper husband and a good soldier.

 

 

rev020604