|
An overview
I'm
not going to attempt to compare the 1967 Far from the Madding
Crowd with the 1998 version aired on PBS, but rather to remind
you of the splendid and classic film made 20 years ago.
Those of us lucky enough to be
able to see Schlesinger and Roeg's film on laser disk as it was
shot, in wide screen, know that it is beautifully framed, supported
by an evocative score by Richard Rodney Bennett, and peopled
with a cast of local extras who provide a real feeling for the
Dorset faces and voices that were Hardy's milieu. The key scenes
are compelling and fresh. The story unrolls with what seems to
me just the right pace: you settle in to enjoy it, and unlike
many later Hardy stories, you are rewarded with a happy ending.
John Leonard on
the film
"You may
not remember the last attempt to turn Thomas Hardy's novel Far
from the Madding Crowd into a movie. In 1967, John Schlesinger
[at right, dressed as an extra for the wedding scene] directed
Julie Christie, Alan Bates, Peter Finch, and Terence Stamp in
an adaptation by Frederic Raphael. The cinematographer was Nicolas
Roeg, than whom Christie has no more passionate admirer except
maybe me. That such a cast and crew could make a film nobody
wanted to see is still a mystery to Leonard Maltin. The problem,
as Pauline Kael among several others would point out, was that
Hardy took a long while, including a marriage and a murder, to
get to the final clinch. And John Schlesinger was far too sophisticated
to resort to the usual Hollywood shorthand of dissolves and/or
montages to signal the passing of collapsed time. So the melodramatic
passions, the obsessions and the compulsions, seemed to arrive
by ambush, like a sucker punch. Besides which, some of us found
it impossible to imagine Julie Christie farming sheep. --
New York, 11.v.98.
Alan Bates on his
role
"...What's
good about the film -- tremendous, in fact -- is the atmosphere,
the period, the whole sense of that farm at work, and the distance
and the elements of nature -- all these things. I think perhaps
that, at some point, something went away from the four central
characters in terms of their relationship with each other. They
seemed to stand in four corners too much, and the pressure of
them upon each other wasn't strong enough or full enough. Because
that's really what it's about -- the very deep-seated passions
between those four people. ...
"By the way, I didn't want
to play my part in Far From the Madding Crowd, simply
because I felt it would come as no surprise to anybody that I
could do it, you know. It called on certain qualities that I'd
used before. And I think it's necessary to surprise people --
and to surprise myself. Perhaps I'm trying to prove something
to myself. I suppose I am. Why not? I would much rather have
played Troy. Anyway, I didn't. But I mean, Gabriel Oak is a great
part, and he's quite difficult because he's so good. Wise and
patient people are very difficult to act." -- interviewed
by Gordon Gow for Films and Filming, June 1971.
Here is an interview with Alan
just as the filming was ending.
The Novel and the
Film
Thomas Hardy spent almost all of his life (1840-1928) in Dorset,
one of the remotest and most rustic parts of England. Throughout
his formative years it was a region untouched by modernity, so
that the England he knew intimately was closer in custom and
tradition to the 17th and 18th centuries than to his own era.
The pervasive influence of this earlier age, in a place where
time had stood still, imbued Hardy with a deep sense of the continuity
of life as part of nature. This profound awareness enabled him
to observe the world with a quiet detachment unequaled in any
other contemporary English writer.
Far From the Madding Crowd
(1874) was the first of Hardy's great novels. It has more of
the splendor and freshness of life than its more somber successors.
Despair had not yet overwhelmed him. the title is drawn from
Gray's "Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard":
Far from the madding crowd's ignoble strife,
Their sober wishes never learned to stray;
Along the cool sequestered vale of life
They kept the noiseless tenor of their way.
It is a narrow
world. Each village is an entity and the market town, ten miles
away, was visited only on special occasions, while a city like
Bath, fifty miles away, was as remote as Baghdad. The social
order was static. Farmers had always been farmers and expected
always to remain farmers. The novel and the film point out the
virtue in the old social order. These humble lives had a security
unknown to us today. Here in Wessex, as Hardy called this section
of England. we see Western man for the last time as an integral
part of nature.
There are some wonderful scenes
in the film -- the lambing, the fire, the struggle to save the
barley ricks, the sheep washing and shearing -- all bathed and
glorified in the light of poetic recollection. The shearing supper,
with Bathsheba, the heroine, singing to the accompaniment of
Gabriel's flute, is a pastoral moment never to be forgotten,
a moment full of sunny mirth and quiet beauty touched with melancholy.
Perhaps the happiest piece of
casting in the movie is that of the main character -- nature.
And since her role cannot be "played" but can only
be, the director took his human cast to the great unhuman protagonist
and shot his scenes on the very spot in which Hardy had conceived
of them as taking place. It would be difficult to find a more
beautiful place than these great hills rising above the sea and
enfolding in their lower slopes and valleys the old graystone
villages.
The landscape is lovely, but it
is also brooding and slightly sinister. Gabriel's sheep are killed
because they act like sheep. The young dog that drives them to
their death does so because he acts like a young dog. And Gabriel
endures his loss because he must, as a tree endures a stroke
of lightning.
 Hardy's
search for the meaning of life is portrayed on the screen with
skill and understanding. The course of each life is determined
either by chance or an irrational impulse. In Gabriel's case
it was the loss of his sheep and his arrival at Bathsheba's farm
just in time to help put out the fire. In Bathsheba's, it was
the encounter with Troy in the dark and, later, Joseph Poorgrass's
dawdling at the inn so that Fanny Robin's coffin had to be kept
at the farmhouse overnight. In Boldwood's, it was Bathsheba's
reckless sending of the valentine. In Troy's, it was Fanny's
misunderstanding of where they were to meet for the wedding.
Neither as a novel nor as a film
is this a routine boy-meets-girl love story. Love, indeed, shapes
the plot, but here it works with a destructive fury that leaves
tragedy in its wake. The story is a vivid confirmation of Hardy's
belief that some force of which we know nothing is using us for
some end which we cannot understand. Oak, the gentle shepherd
who is forced by a trick of fate to be a servant to the woman
he loves, is almost the only one of Hardy's heroes who successfully
dominates one of his emotional, capricious, dangerous heroines.
-- Excerpts from an essay by Bergen Evans, from the MGM
book written for the film's premiere.
Of Course! It's ...
The poster for the Polish release of
Far from the Madding Crowd. Those arms are Julie Christie;
from the red coat, one assumes that she's embracing Terence Stamp.
|